Operational visibility
Map the AI workflows already in use, the people affected, the named owner, and the systems or data each workflow can reach.
AI governance readiness check
Turn AI Act uncertainty into an operational action list.
Answer 9 questions to see which practical controls are visible, which gaps should be closed first, and which questions belong with legal, compliance, security, or communications specialists.
This browser-only check is operational guidance, not legal advice or a formal compliance assessment. Your answers are not sent to LimeShift.
Browser-only operational check
AI Act Operational Readiness Check
Review one current AI system or workflow. Choose the answer that reflects how it operates today, not what is planned. The result updates as you move through the check.
Your answers stay in this browser. No account, upload, or automatic submission is used.
What the check covers
Operational controls first, formal conclusions with the relevant specialist.
The result is designed to make the next operating conversation concrete without pretending that a browser tool can replace legal, regulatory, security, privacy, or communications review.
-
-
Human control and evidence
Pressure-test review points, approval criteria, durable records, failure response, and the rhythm leadership uses to review value and risk.
-
Specialist handoff
Separate operating questions from formal legal, compliance, security, data-protection, or communications decisions that need the relevant specialist.
How to use the result
Turn the score into three owned actions, not a compliance badge.
The score is a structured snapshot of the answers you selected. Use it to organize the next 30 days and improve the evidence available to leadership and specialists.
-
Choose one live workflow
Answer for one AI system or workflow as it operates today. Avoid combining several teams or tools into one optimistic answer.
-
Use the first three gaps
Turn the prioritized result into named actions with owners and dates for the next 30 days.
-
Escalate the formal questions
Take legal classification, regulated obligations, security, privacy, and communications decisions to the relevant specialist with the operating map attached.
Sources and further guidance
Keep the operational plan connected to official guidance.
Official sources remain authoritative for the regulation. LimeShift focuses on workflow mapping, ownership, review, evidence, and implementation support.
-
Official Regulation: Articles 50 and 113
EUR-Lex text of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, including transparency obligations and the application timetable. Formal interpretation belongs with qualified counsel.
-
European Commission: AI Act regulatory framework
Official overview of the EU AI Act, its risk-based approach, governance structure, and implementation timeline.
-
European Commission: transparency code of practice
Official information on the code of practice for marking and labelling AI-generated content.
-
LimeShift: operational transparency guide
Practical guidance on notices, generated content, human review, ownership, and the preparation business teams can begin now.
FAQ
What this check can and cannot tell you.
Does this check determine whether we comply with the EU AI Act?
No. It is an operational readiness check, not legal advice, a risk classification, a conformity assessment, or proof of compliance. Use the result to prepare better questions and evidence for the relevant specialists.
Does LimeShift receive my answers?
No. The answers and score are calculated in your browser and are not uploaded or submitted automatically. You can copy the result or contact LimeShift separately if you choose.
Which workflow should we assess first?
Start with a workflow that affects people, public content, important decisions, sensitive data, or business-critical execution. Assess workflows separately so ownership and controls stay clear.